A Comparison of Terrestrial and Marine Chemical Ecology


Chuck Lang
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, Colorado 80523

Chemical Ecology EN570
Spring 1994

Abstract:  Both marine and terrestrial plants produce a diversity of 
secondary metabolites that deter feeding by herbivores; differences 
occur primarily by virtue of the available elements in the sea.  While 
similarities do exist, it is apparent that marine organisms have 
developed secondary metabolic pathways that are distinct from 
terrestrial systems.  Evidence available from marine communities 
suggests that terrestrial models of plant-herbivore interactions and the 
types of chemical defenses that have evolved (qualitative vs 
quantitative) cannot be applied to the marine environment. 

Introduction

	The importance of secondary plant compounds in reducing herbivory 
in terrestrial communities is well studied and generally viewed as being 
one of the most effective defensive mechanisms. In contrast to the well-
studied interactions between terrestrial plant metabolites and 
herbivores, the potential importance of seaweed secondary compounds on 
marine herbivores are largely un-investigated.  Only within the last 
decade have researchers began to realize the biological potential of 
marine secondary metabolism. 	As in terrestrial ecosystems, marine plant 
communities must escape, deter or tolerate herbivory in order to 
persist.  A comparison of chemical defense in marine versus terrestrial 
communities raises the following questions:   1)  How does marine 
secondary metabolism compare to that of terrestrial communities?  2)  
Can present terrestrial plant-herbivore theories be applied to the 
marine environment?

I  Contrasts in Marine - Terrestrial Secondary Metabolism

Elemental Composition	Both marine and terrestrial plants produce a 
diversity of secondary metabolites that deter feeding by herbivores; 
differences occur primarily by virtue of the composition of available 
elements in the sea (Hay and Fenical 1988).  The halide - rich marine 
environment has facilitated the incorporation of bromine, chlorine and 
iodine into organic structures.  These elements are not only 
incorporated into diverse structure types, but also appear to play an 
essential role in terpene biosynthesis.  The occurrence of halogens in 
terrestrial secondary metabolism is a rare process observed only in a 
few microorganisms (Fenical 1982).

	Although sulfur concentration is high in seawater, primarily as 
sulfate (2700 mg/liter), the reduced organic form of the element is rare 
in marine secondary metabolism (Fenical 1982). A few novel examples do 
exist, however, including the isolation of nereistoxin (1), a disulfide 
from the marine worm Lumbriconereis heteropoda (Okaichi and Hashimoto 
1967).  Nereistoxin isolation provided the framework for the 
structurally related insecticide Padan (2), commonly used in Japan (Fig. 
1).  One example illustrating similar biosynthetic pathways in marine 
and terrestrial systems is the polysulfide, lenthionine (3), isolated 
from the red seaweed Chondria californica (Wratten and Faulkner 1976).  
Lenthionine had previously been associated as a antibacterial component 
of the mushroom,  Lentinus edodes.

Terpene Biosynthesis

	Perhaps the most significant modification in marine secondary 
metabolism can be found in terpene biosynthesis.  Terpenes are common in 
both marine plants and animals and their formation via the condensation 
of isopentenyl pyrophosphate units is similar to terrestrial metabolism.  
The emphasis in the marine environment is found largely in the 
production of higher weight terpenes, particularly the diterpenes.  On 
land, however, the occurrence of monoterpenes is a prominent feature of 
many common plants (Fenical 1982).

	A modification of considerably more interest is found in the 
incorporation of halogens, particularly bromine, in the primary 
production of terpenes via cyclization reactions.  On the basis of 
structural features the production of cyclized terpenoids in terrestrial 
systems involves modifications of the monoterpene precursor geraniol, 
followed by a hydrogen ion-induced cyclization to produce the 
carbocyclic ring (Fig. 2).  In marine plants this process is replaced by 
a bromine - induced cyclization, perhaps involving an electron - 
deficient bromonium ion (Fenical 1975).  This terpenoid process 
utilizing bromine is common in marine organisms and approximately 400 
haloterpenoids have been isolated (Hay and Fenical 1988).
Marine Alkaloids	Basic, nitrogen-containing compounds (alkaloids) are 
common components of terrestrial plants but rare and perhaps even 
completely absent in the marine environment (Hay and Fenical 1992).  Two 
reported references of 'true' marine alkaloids were both isolated from 
marine sponges (Fig. 3).  Flustramine A (4), isolated from the marine 
sponge  flustra foliacea, is a brominated alkaloid (Carle and 
Christophersen 1979).  The second example is an isoquinoline alkaloid, 
renierone (5), isolated from the sponge  Reniera (McIntyre and Faulkner 
1979).

Marine Acetogenins

Acetogenins are linear, non-branched compounds normally produced from 
the condensation of C2 acetate units via the precursor, acetyl-coenzyme 
A .  This primary metabolic pathway is responsible for the production of 
plant lipids and fatty acids.  In both marine and terrestrial organisms 
modifications of this pathway yield secondary metabolites of unique 
biological significance.  Within the acetate pathway several marine 
species produce molecules that are unprecedented in terrestrial systems.

	Perhaps the most noteworthy example of unique acetogenins 
synthesis is that of the red seaweed Asparagopsis taxiformis.  This 
plant, reported to be highly odorous, produces large amounts of 
halomethane type derivatives 6 - 10 (Fig. 4) (McConnell and Fenical 
1977).  Halogenated methanes are considered to be potent biocides adding 
to the unpredictability of their natural synthesis.  Asparagopis also 
produces small amounts of chloroform (9) and carbon tetrachloride (10), 
considered to be totally manmade and possible carcinogens (Lovelock et 
al. 1973).

	Two more examples of marine acetogenins are brevetoxin B (BTX-B) 
and palytoxin, both being the subject of considerable investigation over 
the past two decades due to their significant economic impact to costal 
areas.  Outbreaks of the toxic marine dinoflagellate Gymnodinium breve 
("Red-tide") may result in massive fish and bird mortalities as well as 
considerable discomfort to humans from consuming toxic oysters and 
clams. Lin (1981) was the first to characterize the G. breve toxins, BTX 
- B, (Fig. 5) as being a C 50 polyether.  Polyethers are considered to 
be ion chelators, possibly accounting for the potent biological activity 
of the G. breve toxins.

	Palytoxin, or "Limu-make-o-Hana" by its Hawaiian name, is a highly 
toxic marine compound isolated from the zoanthid coral Palythoa (Fig. 
6).  The early Hawaiians recognized the potent toxicity of this organism 
and applied it to the tips of their spears as a poison.  Palythoa 
species are abundant in most tropical waters with many species reported 
to be at least "moderately toxic" (Fenical 1982).  The palytoxin 
isolated from P. toxica is thought to be one of the most poisonous 
nonproteinaceous substances known (Moore 1971 and Scheuer).

	Moore (1971) and his associates in Hawaii were the first to 
successfully elucidate the structure of this highly complex compound. 
Palytoxin is comprised of a linear arrangement of 115 carbon atoms with 
8 methyl groups and the somewhat uncommon two cyclic ketal 
constellations which are part of 11 ether linkages.  Even by todays 
current standards and technological advancements, the successful 
characterization of this complex compound should be considered a major 
achievement.

	While similarities do exist it is apparent that marine organisms 
have developed secondary metabolic pathways that are distinct from 
terrestrial systems.  However, the original question of how secondary 
metabolism compares in these two communities may be somewhat unresolved 
primarily due to the nature of the distinct taxa that occurs within 
these two environments.

II  Can terrestrial plant-herbivore theories be applied to the         
marine environment?

Co-Evolution

Secondary plant metabolites have been shown to play a major role in 
susceptibility of terrestrial plants to herbivory (Rosenthal and Janzen 
1979, Coley et al. 1985).  Even though the defensive nature of these 
plant secondary metabolites has been clearly demonstrated, it is not 
unusual to find specialist herbivores that have evolved a tolerance to 
these compounds (Rosenthal and Janzen 1979, Crawley 1983).  The majority 
of these specialist feeders tend to be relatively immobile larvae of 
small invertebrates (Ehrlich and Raven 1965, Freeland and Janzen 1974).

	In contrast to the well-studied patterns seen in terrestrial 
systems, marine communities are dominated by a diverse assemblage of 
generalists grazers such as fishes (Hay 1991), urchins (Lawrence 1975) 
and gastropods (Duffy and Hay 1990) that feed from many plant types and 
families.  It has been estimated that about 90% of herbivorous insect 
species feed on three or fewer plant families (Bernays 1989) while 
marine herbivores are considerably more opportunistic, often feeding on 
more than 20 plant families and even supplementing their diets with 
animal material (Hay and Fenical 1988).  Thus, the potential for closely 
linked co-evolution between pairs of interacting species in the marine 
environment would be less likely than that which might occur in 
terrestrial communities.

	The potential for co-evolution in the marine environment may be 
further discounted by considering two fundamental differences between 
terrestrial and marine communities.  First, most insects have generation 
times that are usually much shorter than those of the plants on which 
they feed. Theoretically this should allow insects to adapt to plant 
defenses faster than plants can respond to acquired insect feeding 
preferences.  In marine communities, this may not be the case.  Fishes 
and sea urchins, the primary herbivores within the marine environment, 
have generation times that are similar or even greater than the seaweed 
on which they graze (Hay and Fenical 1988).

	The second fundamental difference between these two herbivore 
communities is in the manner of host selection by juveniles.  In many 
specialized insects, adults are highly mobile and selectively search 
large areas so as to carefully oviposit their offspring on appropriate 
hosts.   In contrast to this, herbivorous fishes and  sea urchins have 
larval stages that are liberated into a large ocean with only a slight 
ability to choose a particular micro-habitat.  Additionally, larvae 
approaching costal area are subjected to intense predation and therefore 
may be constrained or discouraged from approaching multiple times to 
select for a rare host plant (Hay and Fenical 1988).  These factors 
should select for generalists feeders that can utilize a wide variety of 
host plants and minimize the potential for reciprocal coevolution.

	It should be mentioned, however, that some small marine organisms 
(mesograzers) are specialized to certain host plants (Hay et al. 1987).  
These herbivores also tend to be exceptions to the patterns in 
generation times and means of dispersal as outlined above.  Mesograzers 
such as amphipods brood their young or undergo direct development and 
therefore avoid random dispersal stages.  These differences between 
mesograzers and larger marine herbivores could explain, in part, why 
some mesograzers have adapted to seaweed chemical defenses that 
effectively deter generalists feeders (Hay and Fenical 1992).  It 
appears, however, that these mesograzers have only a marginal impact on 
plant fitness so the potential for true co-evolution between mesograzers 
and their prey is probably limited (Carpenter 1986; Lewis 1986; Hay and 
Fenical 1992).

Plant apparency and resource availability models

One of the most influential models to provide a conceptual framework for 
plant-herbivore interactions has been the plant apparency model (Feeney 
1976; Rhoades and Cates 1976).  This model contrasted two different 
plant types, long lived and short lived, and attempted to explain 
fundamental differences in their defensive strategies.  Long lived or 
slow growing plants, that commonly dominated climax communities were 
'bound to be found' and termed apparent plants.  These apparent type 
plants would have to invest heavily in defenses that were generalized 
and effective against a broad range of herbivores.  Tannins were 
proposed to fill this role by acting as digestibility reducers with 
little possibility of counter adaption on the part of herbivores.  Since 
tannins were thought to function in a dose dependent manner they were 
termed as a quantitative defensive mechanism.

	In contract, fast growing, short lived plants that were 
unpredictable in space and time were termed unapparent plants since 
plants with these characteristics would be more likely to escape 
detection by herbivores.  Because this plant type allocated most of 
their resources to rapid growth, reproduction and dispersal, unapparent 
plants should be defended by relatively inexpensive toxins that would be 
effective in low concentrations by generalists herbivores.  However, 
specialist herbivores should evolve the ability to circumvent these 
toxins by a variety of detoxification mechanisms.  Because the toxicity 
of these compounds was thought to be effective at low concentrations 
they were termed  qualitative defenses.  According to this model, 
apparent plants were thought to differ from unapparent plants in three 
primary ways (Fox 1981):
	1.  the overall amount of resources invested by the plant              
for defense;
	2.  the types and modes of action of compounds used for                
defense, for example digestibility reducers versus                 
toxins; and
	3.  the underlying potential for co-evolution of plants and            
their corresponding herbivores.

A somewhat more recent model (Coley et al. 1985) explains the above 
observed patterns as attributable to a plant's available resources 
rather than its apparency.  The resource availability model retains many 
of the same distinctions regarding differences in costs and effects of 
qualitative versus quantitative defenses.  Both of these models were 
developed based on terrestrial-herbivore interactions but the ecological 
and evolutionary generalities upon which the models were formed suggests 
that they should apply equally well to plant-herbivore interactions 
within the marine environment as well.

	Application of the plant apparency theory to the marine 
environment would predict that apparent seaweeds, such as kelps, should 
have high levels of phlorotannins as compared to the less apparent 
Fucales but the available data indicates the opposite pattern (Estes and 
Steinberg 1988, Steinberg 1985).  The resource availability model would 
predict that seaweeds in nutrient rich habitats (shallow temperate 
seaweed beds) would have lower phlorotannin levels as compared to 
seaweeds with less nutrients available (shallow coral reefs); this 
again, is not the case.  Phlorotannins are common and relatively 
abundant in temperate brown algae but nearly absent altogether from 
similar tropical species (Steinberg 1989).

	Additionally, apparent seaweeds on shallow tropical reefs are 
attacked by a wide variety of generalists predators (Hay and Fenical 
1992).  Even though herbivory can be extreme in these areas  (losses of 
60-100% of primary production), seaweeds produce little, if any, 
phlorotannins but rather seem to rely on qualitative defensive compounds 
such as terpenes (Steinberg 1989).  Both the plant-apparency model and 
the resource availability model would predict the opposite; these plants 
should be defended by phlorotannins rather than qualitative defenses.

	Both of the above models make the major assumption that high 
concentrations of quantitative type defenses (tannins) are more costly 
than low concentrations of more toxic qualitative defenses (terpenes or 
alkaloids).  While it is apparent that more energy is stored in 
quantitative type defenses it is not clear, however, that energy can be 
correlated with costs.  Toxins could actually be more expensive than 
tannins in some cases due to the fact that once tannins are produced 
they appear to have minimal maintenance costs (Fox 1981).  Additionally, 
seaweeds are often nutrient poor and carbon rich, and they may leach 
large amounts of carbon when resources are limited and the excess carbon 
cannot be used for growth (Hay and Fenical 1992).  It is therefore 
possible that phlorotannins may serve at times as simply a means to 
store excess carbon and may constitute no cost at all to the plant.

	From the above examples it is apparent that previous 
generalizations about the effectiveness and mode of action of 
qualitative versus quantitative chemical defenses cannot be applied to 
the marine environment. Just as a single compound can have a 
considerable variation on its effects on the feeding of different 
herbivores, very similar compounds can differ markedly in their effects 
on the same or similar herbivores.  Although terrestrial ecologists have 
often undertaken investigations of plant chemical defenses by simply 
lumping compounds into classes and assuming that these classes of 
compounds have similar biological activities, this is apparently not a 
useful approach for the marine ecosystem.

	While similarities do exist between marine and terrestrial 
organisms, it is apparent that the secondary metabolic processes that 
have evolved in the marine environment are distinct from their 
terrestrial counterparts.  Marine and terrestrial plants comprise 
different taxonomic groups making comparisons somewhat difficult and 
forcing crude generalizations.  However, focusing on the similarities 
and differences in these two communities may provide clues to factors 
affecting the evolution of plant-herbivore interactions in general.

                         REFERENCES
Bernays EA (1989) Host range in phytophagous insects:  the 	potential 
role of generalist predators. Evol. Ecol.  3:  	299-311.

Carle JS, Christophersen J  (1979)  Bromo-substituted physostigmine 
alkaloids from a marine bryozoa Flustra foliacea. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101:  
4012-4014.

Carpenter RC (1986)  Partitioning herbivory and its effects on 	coral 
reef algal communities.  Ecol.  Monogr.  56:  345-363.

Coley PD, Bryant JP and FS Chapin (1985) Resource availability 	and 
plant antiherbivore defense.  Science 230:  895-899.

Crawley MJ  (1983) Herbivory:  the dynamics of animal-plant 
interactions.  Univ. of Calf. Press, Berkeley, California.

Duffy JE, Hay ME  (1990)  Seaweed adaptations to herbivory. Bioscience 
40:  368-375.

Ehrlich PR, Raven PH  (1965) Butterflies and plants:  a study in 
coevolution.  Evolution 18:  586-608.

Estes JA, Steinberg PD  (1988)  Predation, herbivory, and kelp 
evolution.  Paleobiology 14:  19-36.

Feeny P (1976)  Plant apparency and chemical defense.  Recent 	Adv. 
Phytochem.  10:  1-40.

Fenical W (1975)  Halogenation in the Rhodophyta:  A review.  J. Phycol.  
11:  245-259.

Fenical W  (1982)  Natural products chemistry in the marine environment.  
Science 215:  923-928.

Fox LR  (1981)  Defense and dynamics in plant-herbivore systems. Am. 
Zoo. 21:  853-864.

Freeland WJ, Janzen DH  (1974)  Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the 
role of plant secondary compounds.  Am.  Nat.  108:  	269-289.

Hay ME (1991)  Marine-Terrestrial contrasts in the ecology of 	plant 
chemical defenses against herbivores.  Trends Eco.  	Evol.  6:  362-
365.

Hay ME, Duffy JE and CA Pfister (1987) Chemical defense against 
different marine herbivores:  Are amphipods insect 	equivalents?  
Ecology 68:  1567-1580.

Hay  ME, Fenical W (1988)  Marine plant-herbivore interactions:  	The 
ecology of chemical defense.  Ann.  Rev. Ecol.  Syst. 19:  111-145.


Hay ME, Fenical W (1992)  Chemical mediation of seaweed-herbivore 
interactions.  In "Plant-Animal Interactions in the marine 	benthos", ed 
by DM John, SJ Hawkins and JH Price, 46:  319-	337.

Lawrence JM  (1975)  On the relationship between marine plants 	and 
sea urchins.  Ocean.  Mar.  Bio.  Ann.  Rev.  13:  213-	286.

Lewis SM  (1986)  The role of herbivores fishes in the 	organization 
of a Caribbean reef community.  Ecol Monogr.  	56:  183-200.

Lin YY, Martin R  (1981)  Isolation and structure of brevetoxin B from 
the "red tide" dinoflagellate Ptychodiscus brevis (Gymnodinium breve) J. 
Am. Chem. Soc. 103: 6773-6775. 

Lovelock JE, Maggs RJ and RJ Wade  (1973)  Halogenated hydrocarbons in 
and over the Atlantic.  Nature 241:  194-196.

McConnell OJ, Fenical W  (1977)  Halogen chemistry of the red alga 
Asparagopsis. Phytochem. 16:  367-369.

McIntyre D, Faulkner DJ  (1979)  Renierone, an antimicrobial metabolite 
from a marine sponge.  Tet.  Lett.  43:  4163-	4166.

Moore RE, Scheuer PJ  (1971)  Palytoxin: A new marine toxin from a 
coelenterate.  Science 172:  495-496.

Okaichi T, Hashimoto Y  (1962)  The structure of nereistoxin. Agric. 
Biol. Chem. 26:  224-227.

Rhoades D, Cates R  (1976)  Toward a general theory of plant 
antiherbivore chemistry.  Recent Adv.  Phytochem. 10: 168-213.
	
Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH  (1979)  Herbivores:  their interaction with 
secondary plant metabolites.  Academic Press, NY NY.

Steinberg PD  (1985)  Feeding preferences of Tegula Funebralis 	and 
chemical defense of marine brown algae Ecol.  Monogr.  	55:  333-
349.

Steinberg PD  (1989)  Biogeographical variation in brown algal 
polyphenolics and other secondary metabolites:  Comparison 	between 
temperate Australasia and North America.  Oecologia (Berlin)  78:  373-
382.

Wratten SJ,  Faulkner DJ  (1976)  Cyclic polysulfides from the red alga 
Chondria californica. J. Org. Chem. 41: 2465-2467.